Skip to content

Unknown Labels

When querying indexed ENS names, you may encounter labels represented as Encoded LabelHashes like [428...b0b] instead of human-readable strings.

An Unknown Label is a Label for which the human-readable string is not available, and only the LabelHash is known. These labels are displayed using the format [{LabelHash}].

Unknown labels are an unfortunate user experience issue in the ENS ecosystem. They make names difficult to read, understand, and work with in applications.

When an unknown label is encountered, it is represented as an Encoded LabelHash in the format [{labelhash}], where {labelhash} is the 64-character hexadecimal representation of the labelhash (without the 0x prefix).

Examples:

  • vitalik.eth — a normalized name with known labels
  • [731f7025b488151de311c24abc1f27f02940bde412246fbdb3dea0d4f0663b22].eth — a name with an unknown label encoded as a labelhash, followed by the known label eth
  • 731f7025b488151de311c24abc1f27f02940bde412246fbdb3dea0d4f0663b22.eth — a name where the first label is known and happens to contain 64 hex characters (no square brackets)

The square bracket encoding is essential to differentiate between an unknown label (represented by its labelhash) and a known label that literally contains hex characters.

Unknown labels arise from the fundamental design of the ENS protocol:

In the ENS Registry contract, only the name’s node is registered on-chain. The node is a 32-byte hash computed using the namehash function, which recursively applies the labelhash function to each label in the name.

The critical point: The Registry stores only the node (the hash), not the human-readable labels that compose the name. This means:

  1. Direct Registry calls can create subnames by providing only the labelhash, without revealing the label string on-chain
  2. Historical data from before label emission was standardized may not include label information
  3. Event logs may only contain labelhashes, not the original label strings

In many cases, the labels that make up a name can be made known:

  • Contract events: Some contracts (like ETHRegistrarController or NameWrapper) emit the human-readable label in their events
  • Rainbow table lookups: The human-readable label for a given labelhash can sometimes be determined via rainbow table lookups and other strategies
  • ENSRainbow healing: ENSRainbow attempts to heal unknown labels by looking up labelhashes in its rainbow tables

However, if none of these methods succeed, the label remains unknown and must be represented as an encoded labelhash.

Why Unknown Labels Are Forever a Consideration

Section titled “Why Unknown Labels Are Forever a Consideration”

Unknown labels are a permanent architectural constraint of the ENS protocol, not a temporary issue that can be fully eliminated. Here’s why:

The ENS Registry contract design is immutable—it cannot be changed retroactively. The fundamental design decision to store only nodes (hashes) rather than labels means that:

  • Historical subnames created without label emission will always have unknown labels unless they can be healed via rainbow tables
  • Future subnames can still be created via direct Registry calls that only provide labelhashes
  • The protocol cannot require label emission for all subname creation methods without breaking backward compatibility

The labelhash function uses keccak256, a cryptographic hash function that is one-way:

  • Given a label, you can compute its labelhash: labelhash("vitalik") → 0xaf2c...
  • Given a labelhash, you cannot reverse it to get the original label: 0xaf2c... → ???

This means that without external knowledge (rainbow tables, event logs, etc.), a labelhash cannot be converted back to its original label.

New subnames continue to be created on-chain. While many modern contracts emit label information in events, the protocol itself does not guarantee this. Unknown labels will continue to appear as long as:

  • Direct Registry calls are used to create subnames
  • Contracts that don’t emit label information are used
  • Historical data without label information is indexed

Unknown labels significantly impact how ENS data is indexed and queried:

When ENSNode indexes onchain events where a subname is created in the ENS Registry:

  1. The labelhash is always known from the onchain event data
  2. The label may be unknown if it wasn’t emitted in the event
  3. ENSRainbow lookup is attempted: ENSNode attempts to lookup the label for the labelhash through an attached ENSRainbow server
  4. Representation decision:
    • If the lookup succeeds: ENSNode represents the subname using its true label
    • If the lookup fails: ENSNode represents the “unknown label” using its labelhash in the format [labelhash]

The representation of labels can change over time as ENSRainbow’s healing capabilities improve:

  • Time 1: ENSRainbow cannot heal label X → label is represented as [labelhash]
  • Time 2: ENSRainbow gains the ability to heal label X → label transitions from unknown to known

This mutability means that:

  • Label representations should not be used as immutable identifiers
  • The node (computed via namehash) should always be used as the stable identifier for querying
  • For deterministic results, pin healing to a specific label set ID + version (see Label Sets & Versioning)

The legacy ENS Subgraph specifies that Unknown Labels and labels containing certain UTF-8 characters are “invalid” or “subgraph-unindexable”. These include:

  1. \0 (null byte) - PostgreSQL does not allow storing this character in text fields
  2. . (period) - Conflicts with ENS label separator logic
  3. [ (left square bracket) - Conflicts with “unknown label” representations
  4. ] (right square bracket) - Conflicts with “unknown label” representations

In ENSNode’s default Interpreted Labels mode (SUBGRAPH_COMPAT=false), when a subgraph-unindexable label is encountered, it will be represented as an Encoded LabelHash even if the actual label data is available. This prevents database and parsing issues while maintaining compatibility with ENS tooling.

How Unknown Labels Influence Apps and User Interfaces

Section titled “How Unknown Labels Influence Apps and User Interfaces”

Unknown labels create significant challenges for applications building on ENS:

Rendering unknown labels requires careful handling to differentiate between:

  • An unknown label (represented as [labelhash])
  • A known label that happens to contain hex characters

Apps must:

  • Display encoded labelhashes in a way that clearly indicates they’re placeholders
  • Handle names that mix known and unknown labels
  • Provide fallback UI when names contain unknown labels

When querying ENSNode for names:

  1. Use nodes, not names: Always use the node (computed via namehash) as the stable identifier, not the name string
  2. Normalization awareness: When querying from user input, normalize first; when querying from onchain data, don’t normalize
  3. Encoded LabelHash-aware namehash: Use implementations like viem’s namehash that handle encoded labelhashes correctly

Unknown labels create poor user experiences:

  • Readability: Names become unreadable (e.g., [428...b0b].eth instead of example.eth)
  • Search & Discovery: Search and filtering become difficult when names contain hashes
  • Trust & Usability: Cryptic hash representations reduce user trust and application usability
  • Accessibility: Screen readers and other assistive technologies struggle with hash-based representations

ENSRainbow mitigates the unknown labels problem by providing a healing service that converts labelhashes back to human-readable labels via rainbow table lookups.

Healing is the act of converting a labelhash back to its original label via a rainbow table lookup. ENSRainbow maintains pre-computed mappings of labelhash → label pairs (called rainbow records) that enable this reverse lookup.

ENSRainbow operates as a sidecar service to ENSNode:

  1. Rainbow Table Storage: ENSRainbow maintains LevelDB databases containing millions of labelhash-to-label mappings
  2. HTTP API: Provides a lightweight HTTP API (GET /v1/heal/{labelhash}) that returns the corresponding label if found (optionally scoped via label_set_id and label_set_version query parameters)
  3. Integration with ENSNode: During indexing, ENSNode automatically queries ENSRainbow when it encounters an unknown labelhash
  4. Deterministic Healing: Uses label set IDs and versions to ensure deterministic healing across time

When ENSNode encounters an unknown label during indexing:

// 1. ENSNode encounters labelhash: 0xaf2caa1c2ca1d027f1ac823b529d0a67cd144264b2789fa2ea4d63a67c7103cc
// 2. ENSNode queries ENSRainbow: GET /v1/heal/0xaf2caa1c2ca1d027f1ac823b529d0a67cd144264b2789fa2ea4d63a67c7103cc
// 3. ENSRainbow looks up in rainbow table
// 4. If found: Returns { "status": "success", "label": "vitalik" }
// 5. ENSNode stores the name as "vitalik.eth" instead of "[af2c...].eth"

ENSRainbow significantly improves healing coverage compared to relying solely on services like the ENS Subgraph. However:

  • Not all labels can be healed: Some labelhashes may never be recoverable if the original label was never emitted anywhere
  • Growing coverage: ENSRainbow’s goal is to heal as many ENS names as possible, minimizing the probability that end-users encounter unknown labels
  • Multiple label sets: Different label sets (identified by label set ID) can provide different coverage, allowing the ecosystem to contribute additional healing data

ENSRainbow uses a label set system to organize rainbow table data:

  • Label Set ID: Identifies a collection of rainbow records (e.g., subgraph, discovery-a)
  • Label Set Version: Monotonically increasing version numbers that enable incremental updates
  • Deterministic Results: Clients can pin to specific versions for reproducible healing results

This system enables:

  • Extensibility: New label sets can be created and published by anyone
  • Incremental Updates: New versions add mappings without invalidating previous versions
  • Deterministic Healing: Applications can rely on consistent results over time

For more details, see Label Sets & Versioning.

Background: Why Rainbow Tables Are Necessary

Section titled “Background: Why Rainbow Tables Are Necessary”

To fully understand why unknown labels are a hard problem, it’s helpful to understand the underlying cryptography that makes ENSRainbow necessary.

The labelhash function computes a 32-byte hash of a label using keccak256.

import { labelhash } from 'viem';
const labelHash = labelhash("vitalik");
// Returns: 0xaf2caa1c2ca1d027f1ac823b529d0a67cd144264b2789fa2ea4d63a67c7103cc

keccak256 is a cryptographic hash function that is one-way:

  • Given a label, you can compute its labelhash: labelhash("vitalik") → 0xaf2c...
  • Given a labelhash, you cannot reverse it to get the original label: 0xaf2c... → ???

This means that without external knowledge (rainbow tables, event logs, etc.), a labelhash cannot be converted back to its original label. This one-way property is exactly why rainbow tables—and ENSRainbow—are necessary.